2024 Toyota GR Supra vs 2024 Nissan Z: Japanese Sports Car Showdown

The rivalry between the Toyota GR Supra and Nissan Z represents a new chapter in Japanese sports car history. Both manufacturers revived iconic nameplates with modern engineering, creating cars that honor their heritage while embracing contemporary technology. After the Supra's 21-year hiatus and the Z's 14-year absence, these 2024 models face enormous expectations from enthusiasts who grew up with their predecessors dominating import culture.

Design Philosophy and Visual Impact

The Supra's swooping, organic lines draw from the FT-1 concept, creating a dramatic silhouette that divides opinion but demands attention. Its proportions—long hood, short deck, pronounced haunches—are unmistakably sports car. At 172.5 inches long and 73.0 inches wide, the Supra appears larger than it is, with aggressive character lines that create visual drama from every angle.

The Z takes a different approach, incorporating retro cues from earlier generations. The LED headlights reference the original 240Z, while the overall shape echoes the 300ZX. It's more evolutionary than revolutionary. At 172.5 inches long but 72.6 inches wide, the Z shares similar dimensions but presents a cleaner, more traditional sports car aesthetic. The rear spoiler on Performance models adds functional downforce while maintaining visual balance.

Interior design philosophies differ markedly. The Supra's cockpit wraps around the driver with BMW iDrive infotainment and a digital gauge cluster. Material quality is exceptional, with genuine carbon fiber trim and premium leather appointments. The Z opts for a more driver-focused layout with three analog gauges, a 12.3-inch touchscreen, and deeply bolstered Recaro seats in Performance trim. Build quality feels solid, though not quite matching the Supra's German-influenced fit and finish.

Powertrain Analysis: Forced Induction Face-Off

The Supra's B58 inline-six, shared with BMW, produces 382 hp and 368 lb-ft of torque. Peak torque arrives at just 1,800 rpm and holds steady until 5,000 rpm, creating a remarkably linear power delivery. The single twin-scroll turbocharger eliminates lag effectively, with full boost arriving by 2,200 rpm. Critics note its German origins, but the powertrain delivers undeniable performance with EPA ratings of 22/30/25 mpg city/highway/combined.

Nissan answered with their VR30DDTT twin-turbo V6, making 400 hp and 350 lb-ft. Peak torque arrives slightly higher at 1,600-5,200 rpm, but the twin-turbo setup provides different character. The V6 delivers more aggressive exhaust notes and sharper throttle response, though fuel economy suffers at 19/28/23 mpg. It's an evolution of the engine in the Infiniti Red Sport models, refined for Z-car duty with revised turbochargers and intercooling.

Real-world performance testing reveals interesting differences. The Supra reaches 60 mph in 3.9 seconds with the automatic transmission, while the Z manages 4.5 seconds with the manual. Quarter-mile times favor the Supra at 12.3 seconds versus 13.0 seconds for the Z. However, the Z's extra 18 horsepower becomes more apparent at higher speeds, where aerodynamics and gearing play larger roles.

Reliability and Maintenance Considerations

The B58 engine has proven reliable in BMW applications since 2015, with common issues limited to minor oil leaks and carbon buildup on high-mileage examples. Maintenance intervals match BMW standards at 10,000 miles, though enthusiasts recommend 5,000-mile oil changes. The VR30DDTT is newer but shares architecture with proven Infiniti applications. Early reports suggest solid reliability, though the twin-turbo setup adds complexity compared to the Supra's single turbocharger.

Transmission Choices and Driving Experience

Both cars offer manuals—a welcome rarity in 2026. The Z's six-speed feels more connected, with shorter throws and better tactile feedback. Rev-matching comes standard and works seamlessly. The Supra's manual arrived later as a customer-demanded addition, featuring intelligent Manual Transmission (iMT) with automatic rev-matching and downshift blipping. While competent, it lacks the organic feel of the Z's Aisin-sourced unit.

Both automatics are excellent but serve different purposes. The Supra uses ZF's 8HP51 8-speed, the same unit in M340i BMWs. Shifts occur in 150 milliseconds with launch control engaged, and manual mode responds instantly to paddle inputs. The Z employs Jatco's CVT-based 9-speed automatic, which simulates fixed gear ratios convincingly. While smooth, it lacks the Supra's aggressive shift programming in Sport+ mode.

Launch control systems differ significantly. The Supra's system allows customizable settings from 1,500-4,000 rpm launch points, managing wheelspin through torque reduction rather than brake intervention. The Z's system is simpler but effective, holding 2,500 rpm and releasing cleanly with minimal drama.

Chassis Dynamics and Track Performance

The Supra feels smaller than it looks from outside. Its 97.2-inch wheelbase and 50:50 weight distribution promote rotation, and the chassis responds to inputs with precision. Curb weight of 3,397 pounds with the automatic helps agility, while the Michelin Pilot Super Sport tires (255/35R19 front, 275/35R19 rear) provide exceptional grip. The adaptive suspension offers genuine differences between Comfort and Sport modes, with the latter firming damping by 30% and quickening steering response.

The Z feels more traditional at 3,486 pounds with the manual transmission. It's heavier, rides firmer, and demands more driver input. The 100.4-inch wheelbase creates more stability at speed but reduces ultimate agility. Bridgestone Potenza S007 tires (245/40R19 front, 275/35R19 rear) on base models provide good grip, while Performance models upgrade to Michelin Pilot Sport 4S rubber with wider 255/40R19 fronts.

Track testing reveals the Supra's advantages in tight, technical circuits. At Laguna Seca, the Supra managed a 1:38.2 lap time compared to the Z's 1:39.8. The difference comes from superior mid-corner grip and more predictable handling at the limit. However, the Z shines on faster tracks where its stability and power advantage become apparent.

Suspension and Steering Tuning

Both cars use double-wishbone front and multi-link rear suspensions, but tuning philosophies differ. The Supra prioritizes compliance and comfort, with softer spring rates allowing more body motion but better bump absorption. The Z runs stiffer springs and anti-roll bars, creating flatter cornering but harsher ride quality on broken pavement.

Steering ratios favor the Supra at 2.1 turns lock-to-lock versus 2.7 for the Z. Both use electric power steering, but the Z provides more on-center feel and road texture. The Supra's steering is accurate if not particularly communicative—a common modern sports car trait that prioritizes consistency over character.

Interior Space and Practicality

Despite similar exterior dimensions, interior packaging differs significantly. The Supra offers 10.2 cubic feet of cargo space in a deep but narrow hatch area. The rear opening is limited, making loading awkward for larger items. Interior storage includes door pockets, center console bin, and small glovebox totaling 3.1 cubic feet.

The Z provides 7.5 cubic feet of cargo space behind the seats, but the opening is wider and more accessible. Interior storage matches the Supra closely at 3.0 cubic feet, though the center console is deeper and more useful for daily items. Both cars accommodate drivers up to 6'3" comfortably, with adequate headroom and legroom for extended drives.

Seat comfort favors specific preferences. The Supra's standard seats provide excellent support with 14-way power adjustment including lumbar and side bolster controls. The Z's base cloth seats offer surprising comfort but lack power adjustment. Performance models include Recaro sports seats with manual adjustment that provide superior lateral support but may prove uncomfortable for some drivers on longer journeys.

Technology and Infotainment

The Supra's BMW iDrive system includes an 8.8-inch display, wireless Apple CarPlay, and premium Harman Kardon audio. The interface is intuitive with the familiar rotary controller, though some Toyota-specific functions feel grafted onto the BMW architecture. The 12-speaker audio system delivers excellent sound quality with clear highs and punchy bass response.

Nissan developed their own NissanConnect system with a 12.3-inch touchscreen, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and optional Bose audio. The interface responds quickly to inputs, and voice recognition works reliably. The 8-speaker Bose system (10-speaker on Performance models) provides good sound quality though not quite matching the Supra's premium setup.

Driver assistance features are comprehensive on both cars. The Supra includes forward collision warning, automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, and lane departure warning as standard. The Z matches these features and adds blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert, giving it a slight advantage in safety technology.

Value Proposition and Ownership Costs

The Z starts around $42,970 for the Sport grade, undercutting the Supra 3.0 Premium at $44,565 by $1,595. However, equipment levels differ significantly. The base Z includes LED headlights, synthetic leather seating, and the 9-speed automatic, while the Supra adds power seats, wireless charging, and premium audio. The Z Performance grade at $52,270 includes Recaro seats, limited-slip differential, and upgraded brakes, making it more expensive than the comparable Supra A91-CF Edition at $49,915.

Insurance costs typically favor the Z due to its lower theft rates and repair costs. Average annual premiums run $1,850 for the Z versus $2,100 for the Supra, according to major insurers. The difference stems from the Supra's higher value and BMW parts pricing for repairs.

Depreciation projections based on similar sports cars suggest the Supra will hold value better initially due to limited production numbers and enthusiast demand. However, the Z's lower entry price may result in better total cost of ownership over five years. Both cars benefit from strong enthusiast communities that support resale values long-term.

Maintenance and Running Costs

Annual maintenance costs favor the Z at approximately $800 versus $1,100 for the Supra. The difference comes from BMW's premium service pricing and more frequent inspection requirements. Both cars require premium fuel, though the Z tolerates regular unleaded with reduced performance. Oil change intervals match at 5,000 miles for optimal engine health, despite manufacturer recommendations of 7,500-10,000 miles.

Performance modifications reveal interesting differences. The Supra's B58 engine responds exceptionally well to tuning, with simple ECU flashes adding 50-80 horsepower safely. The Z's VR30DDTT requires more extensive modifications for similar gains but offers greater ultimate potential for serious builds. Both engines handle bolt-on modifications like intakes and exhausts without reliability concerns.

The Enthusiast Perspective

Community reception has been mixed but increasingly positive for both cars. Supra purists initially criticized the BMW partnership but grudgingly acknowledge the car's performance capabilities. The manual transmission option addressed the most common complaint, and aftermarket support has exploded with companies like HKS, Injen, and Borla offering comprehensive modification packages.

Z enthusiasts appreciate Nissan's in-house development approach and the car's connection to Z heritage. The twin-turbo V6 provides the character many felt was missing from the naturally aspirated 370Z, while the retro styling elements resonate with longtime fans. However, some criticize the interior quality and limited color options compared to the more diverse Supra lineup.

Track day capabilities favor different strengths. The Supra excels at smaller, technical tracks where its lighter weight and superior balance show. The Z performs better at high-speed venues where its aerodynamic efficiency and power advantage become apparent. Both cars handle track duty well with proper cooling modifications and brake upgrades.

The Verdict: Choosing Your Japanese Sports Car

Choose the Supra for daily drivability, refinement, and BMW-derived reliability reputation. Its superior interior materials, advanced technology, and balanced chassis make it the better all-around sports car. The automatic transmission suits commuting better, while the manual satisfies enthusiasts. Fuel economy and ride comfort give it practical advantages for year-round driving.

Choose the Z for a more traditional sports car experience, superior manual transmission, and that distinctly Japanese character. Its aggressive styling, V6 soundtrack, and lower entry price appeal to enthusiasts seeking maximum engagement over refinement. The Performance model's upgraded brakes and differential make it the better track choice for serious drivers.

Both cars deserve the iconic names they carry, representing a renaissance in affordable Japanese sports cars. The Supra succeeds as a modern grand tourer with sports car performance, while the Z delivers pure driving excitement with old-school character. Your preference depends on whether you prioritize daily comfort or weekend thrills, but both choices connect drivers to automotive passion that seemed lost in the crossover era.

Want to see detailed specs for both cars? Browse our database to compare these Japanese sports cars side by side with all the numbers that matter.